Differential Propositional Calculus • 35

Example 2. Drives and Their Vicissitudes (concl.)

Applied to the example of 4^\text{th}‑gear curves, the indexing scheme results in the data of the next two Tables, showing one period for each orbit.

Fourth Gear Orbits 1 and 2

The states in each orbit are listed as ordered pairs (p_i, q_j), where p_i may be read as a temporal parameter indicating the present time of the state and where j is the decimal equivalent of the binary numeral s.

Grasped more intuitively, the Tables show each state q_s with a subscript s equal to the numerator of its rational index, taking for granted the constant denominator of 2^4 = 16.  In that way the temporal succession of states can be reckoned by a parallel round‑up rule.  Namely, if (d_k, d_{k+1}) is any pair of adjacent digits in the state index r then the value of d_k in the next state is {d_k}^\prime = d_k + d_{k+1}.

Resources

cc: FB | Differential LogicLaws of FormMathstodonAcademia.edu
cc: Conceptual Graphs (1) (2)CyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Change, Computational Complexity, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Dynamical Systems, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Gradient Descent, Graph Theory, Group Theory, Hologrammautomaton, Indicator Functions, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematical Models, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Time, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Differential Propositional Calculus • 35

  1. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.