Logical Graphs • Discussion 7

Posted on October 1, 2023 by Jon Awbrey

Re: Logical Graphs • Formal Development
Re: Laws of Form • Alex Shkotin

AS:
When we look at undirected graph it is usual, before describing a rules of graph transformation, to describe exactly what kind of graphs we are working with —

Hi Alex,

I am traveling this week, with limited internet.  There’s a quickie glossary under the heading “Painted And Rooted Cacti” on the following blog page.

Regards,
Jon

cc: FB | Logical Graphs • Laws of Form • Mathstodon • Academia.edu
cc: Conceptual Graphs • Cybernetics • Structural Modeling • Systems Science

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Duality, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown, Topology, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Logical Graphs • Discussion 7

  1. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  5. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 8 | Systems Community of Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.