Re: Peter Woit • Beyond Experiment
I have no horse in this race (cat in this box?) as far as multiverses and polycosmoi go. I will limit myself to clearing up popular confusions about Peirce’s concept of abductive inference.
Analytic philosophy swayed many people into thinking science could be reduced to purely deductive reasoning, eliminating induction and ignoring abduction, but Peirce was a practicing scientist who worked outside that warp. In his model of the inquiry process abduction is at root logically prior to any discussion of probabilities, however true it may be that all three modes of inference work in tandem to advance any moderately complex investigation.
The following article has more information on the history and function of abductive inference.
See especially the following sections.
Pingback: Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 5 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry • 5 | Systems Community of Inquiry