Charles Sanders Peirce, George Spencer Brown, and Me • 20

Re: Laws of FormJames Bowery

JB:
I’m interested in those who have approached the notion of self‑duality from the meta‑perspective of switching perspectives between Directed Cyclic Graphs of NiNAND and NiNOR gates (Ni for N‑Inputs à la boolean network theory).  The burgeoning interest in what might be called “The Self‑Simulation Hypothesis” founded on the notion of self‑duality rather demands this meta‑perspective.

Going through my notes I see I blogged fairly extensively on the En‑Ex duality last year.  There’s so much going on in the world right now I’m having trouble maintaining focus so I’ll just post a collection of links to the relevant title searches against the day when I can review those series and bring them to bear on the topics above.

Resources

cc: Academia.edu • BlueSky • Laws of FormMathstodonResearch Gate
cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Abstraction, Amphecks, Analogy, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Cybernetics, Deduction, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Logic, Duality, Form, Graph Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Semiotics, Sign Relational Manifolds, Sign Relations, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Time, Topology and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Charles Sanders Peirce, George Spencer Brown, and Me • 20

  1. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.