Stricture, Strait, Constraint, Information, Complexity
From here it is easy to see how the concatenation of languages is related to the intersection of sets and thus to the conjunction of logical propositions. In the upshot a cartesian product is described by a logical proposition
subject to the following interpretation.
says there is an element from the set
in the 1st place of the product
.
says there is an element from the set
in the 2nd place of the product
.
The integration of those two pieces of information can be taken to specify a yet to be fully determined relation.
In a corresponding fashion at the level of elements, the ordered pair is described by a conjunction of propositions, namely
subject to the following interpretation.
says that
occupies the 1st place of the product element under construction.
says that
occupies the 2nd place of the product element under construction.
Taking the cartesian product of and
or the concatenation of
and
in the above manner shifts the level of active construction from the tupling of elements in
and
or the concatenation of strings in
and
to the concatenation of external signs describing those sets or languages.
Thus we pass to a conjunction of indexed propositions and
or a conjunction of assertions
and
which mark the indicated sets or languages for insertion in the indicated places of a product set or product language, respectively. On closer examination, we can recognize the subscripting by the indices
and
as a type of concatenation, in this case accomplished through the posting of editorial remarks from an external mark‑up language.
Resources
cc: Academia.edu • BlueSky • Laws of Form • Mathstodon • Research Gate
cc: Conceptual Graphs • Cybernetics • Structural Modeling • Systems Science
Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 8 | Systems Community of Inquiry