Differential Propositional Calculus • 26

Example 1. A Square Rigging (concl.)

If we eliminate from view the regions of \mathrm{E}^2 X ruled out by the dynamic law \mathrm{d}^2 A = \texttt{(} A \texttt{)} then what remains is the quotient structure shown in the following Figure.  The picture makes it easy to see how the dynamically allowable portion of the universe is partitioned between the respective holdings of A and \mathrm{d}^2 A.  As it happens, the fact might have been expressed “right off the bat” by an equivalent formulation of the differential law, one which uses the exclusive disjunction to state the law as \texttt{(} A \texttt{,} \mathrm{d}^2 A \texttt{)}.

Example 1. The Tiller
\text{Example 1. The Tiller}

What we have achieved in this example is to give a differential description of a simple dynamic process.  We did this by embedding a directed graph, representing the state transitions of a finite automaton, in the share of a boolean lattice or n‑cube cut out by nullifying all the regions the dynamics outlaws.

With growth in the dimensions of our contemplated universes it becomes essential, both for human comprehension and for computer implementation, that dynamic structures of interest be represented not actually, by acquaintance, but virtually, by description.  In our present study we are using the language of propositional calculus to express the relevant descriptions, and to grasp the structures embodied in subsets of n‑cubes without being forced to actualize all their points.

Resources

cc: Academia.eduCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science
cc: Conceptual GraphsLaws of FormMathstodonResearch Gate

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Graph Theory, Hologrammautomaton, Indicator Functions, Inquiry Driven Systems, Leibniz, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Propositional Calculus, Time, Topology, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Differential Propositional Calculus • 26

  1. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 8 | Systems Community of Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.