Differential Propositional Calculus • 23


The clock indicates the moment . . . . but what does
     eternity indicate?

— Walt Whitman • Leaves of Grass

A One‑Dimensional Universe (concl.)

It might be thought an independent time variable needs to be brought in at this point but it is an insight of fundamental importance to realize the idea of process is logically prior to the notion of time.  A time variable is a reference to a clock — a canonical, conventional process accepted or established as a standard of measurement but in essence no different than any other process.  That raises questions of how different subsystems in a more global process can be brought into comparison and what it means for one process to serve the function of a local standard for others.  Inquiries of that order serve but to wrap up our present puzzles in further riddles and are far too involved to be handled at our current level of approximation.  We’ll return to them another time.

Observe how the secular inference rules, used by themselves, involve a loss of information, since nothing in them tells whether the momenta \{ \texttt{(} \mathrm{d}A \texttt{)}, \mathrm{d}A \} are changed or unchanged in the next moment.  To know that one would have to determine \mathrm{d}^2 A, and so on, pursuing an infinite regress.  In order to rest with a finitely determinate system it is necessary to make an infinite assumption, for example, that \mathrm{d}^k A = 0 for all k greater than some fixed value M.  Another way to escape the regress is through the provision of a dynamic law, in typical form making higher order differentials dependent on lower degrees and estates.

Resources

cc: Academia.eduCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science
cc: Conceptual GraphsLaws of FormMathstodonResearch Gate

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Functional Logic, Graph Theory, Hologrammautomaton, Indicator Functions, Inquiry Driven Systems, Leibniz, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Propositional Calculus, Time, Topology, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Differential Propositional Calculus • 23

  1. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 8 | Systems Community of Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.