Operator Variables in Logical Graphs • 3

And if he is told that something is the way it is, then he thinks:  Well, it could probably just as easily be some other way.  So the sense of possibility might be defined outright as the capacity to think how everything could “just as easily” be, and to attach no more importance to what is than to what is not.

— Robert Musil • The Man Without Qualities

To get a clearer view of the relation between primary arithmetic and primary algebra consider the following extremely simple algebraic expression.

Cactus Graph (a)

Here we see the variable name {}^{\backprime\backprime} a {}^{\prime\prime} appearing as an operand name in the expression {}^{\backprime\backprime} \texttt{(} a \texttt{)} {}^{\prime\prime}.  In functional terms, {}^{\backprime\backprime} a {}^{\prime\prime} is called an argument name but it’s best to avoid the potentially confusing connotations of the word argument here, since it also refers in logical discussions to a more or less specific pattern of reasoning.

In effect, the algebraic variable name indicates the contemplated absence or presence of any arithmetic expression taking its place in the surrounding template, which expression is proxied well enough by its formal value, and of which values we know but two.  Putting it all together, the algebraic expression {}^{\backprime\backprime} \texttt{(} a \texttt{)} {}^{\prime\prime} varies between the following two choices.

Cactus Graph Set () , (())

The above set of arithmetic expressions is what it means to contemplate the absence or presence of the arithmetic constant {}^{\backprime\backprime} \texttt{(} ~ \texttt{)} {}^{\prime\prime} in the place of the operand {}^{\backprime\backprime} a {}^{\prime\prime} in the algebraic expression {}^{\backprime\backprime} \texttt{(} a \texttt{)} {}^{\prime\prime}.  But what would it mean to contemplate the absence or presence of the operator {}^{\backprime\backprime} \texttt{(} ~ \texttt{)} {}^{\prime\prime} in the algebraic expression {}^{\backprime\backprime} \texttt{(} a \texttt{)} {}^{\prime\prime}?

That is the question I’ll take up next.

cc: FB | Logical GraphsLaws of FormMathstodonAcademia.edu
cc: Conceptual GraphsCyberneticsStructural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Duality, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Operator Variables in Logical Graphs • 3

  1. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Operator Variables in Logical Graphs • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  5. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 8 | Systems Community of Inquiry

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.