Example 1. A Square Rigging (concl.)
If we eliminate from view the regions of ruled out by the dynamic law
then what remains is the quotient structure shown in the following Figure. The picture makes it easy to see how the dynamically allowable portion of the universe is partitioned between the respective holdings of
and
As it happens, the fact might have been expressed “right off the bat” by an equivalent formulation of the differential law, one which uses the exclusive disjunction to state the law as
What we have achieved in this example is to give a differential description of a simple dynamic process. We did this by embedding a directed graph, representing the state transitions of a finite automaton, in the share of a boolean lattice or n‑cube cut out by nullifying all the regions the dynamics outlaws.
With growth in the dimensions of our contemplated universes it becomes essential, both for human comprehension and for computer implementation, that dynamic structures of interest be represented not actually, by acquaintance, but virtually, by description. In our present study we are using the language of propositional calculus to express the relevant descriptions, and to grasp the structures embodied in subsets of n‑cubes without being forced to actualize all their points.
Resources
cc: FB | Differential Logic • Laws of Form • Mathstodon • Academia.edu
cc: Conceptual Graphs (1) (2) • Cybernetics • Structural Modeling • Systems Science

Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 6 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Differential Logic • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry