Animated Logical Graphs • 9

Re: Ken ReganThe Shapes of Computations

The insight it takes to find a succinct axiom set for a theoretical domain falls under the heading of abductive or retroductive reasoning, a knack as yet refractory to computational attack, but once we’ve lucked on a select‑enough set of axioms we can develop theorems which afford a more navigable course through the subject.

For example, back on the range of propositional logic, it takes but a few pivotal theorems plus the lever of mathematical induction to derive the Case Analysis-Synthesis Theorem (CAST) that affords a bridge between proof‑theoretic methods demanding a modicum of insight and model‑theoretic methods able to be run routinely.

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Duality, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.