Re: Operator Variables in Logical Graphs • 4
We have encountered the question of how to extend our formal calculus to take account of operator variables.
In the days when I scribbled my logical graphs on the backs of computer punchcards, the first thing I tried was drawing big loopy script characters, placing some inside the loops of others. Lower case alphas, betas, gammas, deltas, and so on worked best. Graphs like that conveyed the idea that a character-shaped boundary drawn around an enclosed space can be viewed as absent or present depending on whether the formal value of the character in question is unmarked or marked. The same idea can be conveyed by attaching characters directly to the edges of graphs.
For example, the next Figure shows how we might suggest an algebraic expression of the form where the absence or presence of the operator
depends on the value of the algebraic expression
the operator
being absent whenever
is unmarked and present whenever
is marked.
It was clear from the outset that this sort of tactic would need a lot of work to become a usable calculus, especially when it came time to feed those punchcards back into the computer.
cc: FB | Logical Graphs • Laws of Form • Mathstodon • Academia.edu
cc: Conceptual Graphs • Cybernetics • Structural Modeling • Systems Science

Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 7 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 8 | Inquiry Into Inquiry
Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 8 | Systems Community of Inquiry