Tag Archives: Michael Harris

You Say “Réseau” • I Say “Rousseau” • 1

Re: Michael Harris • My Réseau • Networks in Action in French Economics The above two posts by Michael Harris sparked a series of reflections that I have yet to reign in fully but I thought I might pause a … Continue reading

Posted in Community, Community of Inquiry, Community of Interpretation, Inquiry, Manifolds, Mathematics, Michael Harris, Networks, Peirce, Reality, Rousseau, Semiotics, Social Compact, Social Networks, Society | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Semiositis • 1

Re: Cathy O’Neil • Profit as Proxy for Value Re: Michael Harris • Xenomoney There is a deep and pervasive analogy between systems of commerce and systems of communication, turning on their near-universal use of symbola (images, media, proxies, signs, … Continue reading

Posted in Analogy, C.S. Peirce, Cathy O'Neil, Commerce, Communication, Interpretation, Michael Harris, Peirce, Pragmatics, Semantics, Semeiosis, Semiosis, Semiositis, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Syntax, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Inquiry, Signs, Relations • 1

Re: Michael Harris • A Non-Logical Cognitive Phenomenon Human spontaneous non-demonstrative inference is not, overall, a logical process.  Hypothesis formation involves the use of deductive rules, but is not totally governed by them;  hypothesis confirmation is a non-logical cognitive phenomenon:  … Continue reading

Posted in Abduction, Action, Analogy, C.S. Peirce, Cognition, Cognitive Science, Communication, Deduction, Foundations of Mathematics, Induction, Information, Information Theory, Inquiry, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Interpretation, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logic of Science, Mathematics, Michael Harris, Peirce, Philosophy, Philosophy of Mathematics, Philosophy of Science, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Relevance, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment