Differential Logic • Discussion 1

Re: Structural ModelingJoseph Simpson

Thanks, Joe, glad you liked the table, I’ve got a million of ’em!  I’ll be setting another mess of tables directly as we continue studying the effects of differential operators on families of propositional forms.

For anyone wondering, Where’s the Peirce? — the efficiency of Peirce’s logical graphs, augmented by Spencer Brown and generalized to cactus graphs, made it possible for the first time to take on the extra complexities of differential propositional calculus.  This makes Peircean themes a constant throughout the development of differential logic.

Hope you and yours are safe and sound,

Jon

cc: CyberneticsOntolog • Peirce List (1) (2)Structural ModelingSystems Science

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Category Theory, Change, Cybernetics, Differential Analytic Turing Automata, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Discrete Dynamics, Equational Inference, Frankl Conjecture, Functional Logic, Gradient Descent, Graph Theory, Hologrammautomaton, Indicator Functions, Inquiry Driven Systems, Leibniz, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Propositional Calculus, Surveys, Time, Topology, Visualization, Zeroth Order Logic and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.