Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 8

Re: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • (5)(7)
Re: FB | SemeioticsGary Herstein

Continuing questions about “infinite semiosis” vs. “unbounded semiosis” prompt me to make another comment by way of bringing our focus to bear on the empirical context of semiosis and sign relations.

The semiotic question goes back to a line from Peirce and the uses later writers like Eco and Derrida made of it.  But the real issue is not about the cardinality or topology of any sub-posed continuum, “signiferous ether”, or semiotic medium so much as the empirical data streams we actually have, which are captured categorically and coded discretely as sequences of signs.

cc: Systems ScienceStructural Modeling • Peirce (1) (2)Ontolog • Cybernetics (1) (2)

This entry was posted in C.S. Peirce, Cybernetics, Logic, Peirce, Pragmatism, Relation Theory, Semiosis, Semiotics, Sign Relations and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 8

  1. Pingback: Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.