Animated Logical Graphs • 29

Re: Ontolog ForumJoseph Simpson
Re: Animated Logical Graphs • 21

I invoked the general concepts of equivalence and distinction at this point in order to keep the wider backdrop of ideas in mind but since we’ve been focusing on boolean functions to coordinate the semantics of propositional calculi we can get a sense of the links between operations and relations by looking at their relationship in a boolean frame of reference.

Let \mathbb{B} = \{ 0, 1 \} and k a positive integer.  Then \mathbb{B}^k is the set of k-tuples of elements of \mathbb{B}.

  • A k-variable boolean function is a mapping \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}.
  • A k-place boolean relation is a subset of \mathbb{B}^k.

The correspondence between boolean functions and boolean relations may be articulated as follows:

  • Any k-place relation L, as a subset of \mathbb{B}^k, has a corresponding indicator function (or characteristic function) f_L : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B} defined by the rule that f_L (x) = 1 if x is in L and f_L (x) = 0 if x is not in L.
  • Any k-variable function f : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B} is the indicator function of a k-place relation L_f consisting of all the x in \mathbb{B}^k where f(x) = 1.  The set L_f is called the fiber of 1 or the pre-image of 1 in \mathbb{B}^k and is commonly notated as f^{-1}(1).

cc: Systems ScienceStructural ModelingOntolog ForumLaws of FormCybernetics

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Duality, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Animated Logical Graphs • 29

  1. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.