Animated Logical Graphs • 14

Re: Systems ScienceJoseph Simpson

One of the things I added to the Survey this time around was an earlier piece of work titled “Futures Of Logical Graphs” (FOLG), which takes up a number of difficult issues in more detail than I’ve found the ability or audacity to do since.  Among other things, it gives an indication of the steps I took from trees to cacti in the graph-theoretic representation of logical propositions and boolean functions, along with the forces that led me to make that transition.

A lot of the text goes back to the dusty Ascii days of the old discussion lists where I last shared it, so I’ll be working on converting the figures and tables and trying to make the presentation more understandable.

cc: Structural ModelingOntolog ForumLaws of FormCybernetics

This entry was posted in Amphecks, Animata, Boolean Algebra, Boolean Functions, C.S. Peirce, Cactus Graphs, Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Deduction, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Duality, Equational Inference, Graph Theory, Laws of Form, Logic, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Minimal Negation Operators, Model Theory, Painted Cacti, Peirce, Proof Theory, Propositional Calculus, Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems, Spencer Brown, Theorem Proving, Visualization and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Animated Logical Graphs • 14

  1. Pingback: Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 2 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.