{ Information = Comprehension × Extension } • Discussion 8

Re: Structural ModelingJoseph Simpson

Links to previous Selections, Comments, and Discussions on this topic can be found here.  See especially the section on I = C × E.

My plan going forward is to review this material in a systematic manner, redeeming the benefit of what second and third thoughts have surfaced in the meantime.  I’ve studied Peirce for just over 50 years now and I’m still seeing new facets of his work each time I return to what I thought was familiar business.


cc: Systems ScienceOntolog Forum

This entry was posted in Abduction, C.S. Peirce, Comprehension, Deduction, Extension, Hypothesis, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inference, Information = Comprehension × Extension, Information Theory, Inquiry, Intension, Logic, Logic of Science, Peirce, Peirce's Categories, Pragmatic Semiotic Information, Pragmatism, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Sign Relations and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to { Information = Comprehension × Extension } • Discussion 8

  1. Pingback: Survey of Pragmatic Semiotic Information • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.