Icon Index Symbol • 15

Questions Concerning Certain Faculties Claimed For Signs

I put down the cup and turn to my mind.  It is up to my mind to find the truth.  But how?  What grave uncertainty, whenever the mind feels overtaken by itself;  when it, the seeker, is also the obscure country where it must seek and where all its baggage will be nothing to it.  Seek?  Not only that:  create.  It is face to face with something that does not yet exist and that only it can accomplish, and bring into its light.

ProustIn Search of Lost Time

Re: Peirce List Discussion • TGJRJFS

That passage from Proust epitomizes for me one of the most distinctive features of the inquiry process, the fact that its object is a state of information that the inquisiturus, the agent of inquiry, may never have known before.

I have thought of inquiry and intelligence in terms of cybernetic or system-theoretic processes ever since my first encounters with the works of Arbib, Ashby, Bateson, McCulloch, Wiener, Young, and others during my undergrad years.  In the early 90s I returned to grad school in a Systems Engineering program with the idea that I might be able to string together many loose threads of unfinished business that continued to tug at my brain.  Here’s a bit I wrote at the outset of that project, that comes to mind in this context:

Prospects for Inquiry Driven Systems • Architecture of Inquiry

It is important to remember that knowledge is a different sort of goal from the run-of-the-mill setpoints that a system might have.  The typical goal is a state that a system has actually experienced many times before, like normal body temperature for a human being.  But a particular state of knowledge that an intelligent system moves toward may be a state it has never been through before.  The fundamental equivocation on this point expressed in Plato’s Meno, whether learning is functionally equivalent to remembering, was discussed above.  In spite of this quibble, it still seems necessary to regard states of knowledge as a distinctive class.  The reasons for this may lie in the fact that a useful definition of inquiry for human beings necessarily involves a whole community of inquiry.


This entry was posted in Abduction, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Automated Research Tools, C.S. Peirce, Cognitive Science, Computer Science, Data Structures, Deduction, Functional Logic, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Interpretive Frameworks, Knowledge Representation, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logic of Science, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Objective Frameworks, Peirce, Relation Theory, Relative Membership, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Set Theory, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s