Icon Index Symbol • 6

Questions Concerning Certain Faculties Claimed For Signs

Re: Peirce List Discussion • HRJASHR

I think it would be a good idea to continue reviewing basic concepts and get better acquainted with the relational context needed to ground the higher level functions, properties, and structures we might wish to think about.  Once we understand what relations are, then we can drill down to triadic relations, and then sign relations will fall more readily within our grasp.

I’ve written up introductions to these topics on a number of occasions and the latest editions can be found on the InterSciWiki site, though in this case it may be better to take them up in order from special to general:

The related question of Relational Reducibility, in its Compositional and Projective aspects, is treated in the following article:

To be continued …

Resources

This entry was posted in Abduction, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Automated Research Tools, C.S. Peirce, Cognitive Science, Computer Science, Data Structures, Deduction, Functional Logic, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Interpretive Frameworks, Knowledge Representation, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logic of Science, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Objective Frameworks, Peirce, Relation Theory, Relative Membership, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Set Theory, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s