Icon Index Symbol • 1

Questions Concerning Certain Faculties Claimed For Signs

Re: Peirce List Discussion • Jerry Rhee

How best do you distinguish between these terms?  What settles it?

These very questions arose at the outset of my venture into Inquiry Driven Systems, which obliged me to undertake a parallel Inquiry Into Inquiry.  Here’s a few links on how I began to get a handle on the issues, with an eye as always to real-world practical applications:

To get the spirit of what is going on here, imagine yourself designing a software application for assisting with inquiry, one that can begin with the earliest stages of qualitative research and continue helping with the most complex quantitative analyses and statistical inferences.

One of the first things you’ll discover is that you can’t really decide ahead of time all the sorts of things you’ll need to refer to over time.  You’ll need a dynamic database, able to evolve as the need arises, to keep track of all the objects you’ll need to refer to as inquiry progresses, along with all the “instances” you’ll need to analyze and connect the objects, and all the “properties” you’ll need to collect and describe them, as time goes by.

I began discussing one sort of organizational structure flexible enough to handle these tasks, introducing the concept of an Objective Framework (OF), at this point:

In accounting for the special characters of icons and indices that arose in previous discussions, it was necessary to open the domain of objects coming under formal consideration to include unspecified numbers of properties and instances of whatever objects were initially set down.  This is a general phenomenon, affecting every motion toward explanation whether pursued by analytic or synthetic means.  What it calls for in practice is a way of organizing growing domains of objects, without having to specify in advance all the objects there are.

The next several sections discuss how we might apply these very general principles of organization to the more specific task of analyzing iconic and indexical sign relations:


An earlier version of this material can be found at the Arisbe Gateway:

There’s a bit more discussion of the Objective Framework architecture here:

This entry was posted in Abduction, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Automated Research Tools, C.S. Peirce, Cognitive Science, Computer Science, Data Structures, Deduction, Functional Logic, Icon Index Symbol, Induction, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Inquiry Into Inquiry, Intelligent Systems, Interpretive Frameworks, Knowledge Representation, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logic of Science, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Objective Frameworks, Peirce, Relation Theory, Relative Membership, Scientific Method, Semiotics, Set Theory, Sign Relations, Systems Theory, Triadic Relations and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s