Readings On Determination • Discussion 3

Re: Readings On Determination • 1

I keep coming back to Peirce’s early lectures on the logic of science because we see there the first inklings of his prospective theory of information, one of those ideas whose time was ripe enough but whose complete fruition lies yet in the future.  The ideas of constraint, definition, determination, information, and inquiry are naturally deeply intertwined.

Here is a link to my ongoing study of those lectures, focusing on the formula:

Definitions of Peirce’s various terms (content, sphere, etc.) may be found there.

Resource

This entry was posted in Comprehension, Computer Science, Constraint, Definition, Determination, Differential Calculus, Differential Logic, Extension, Form, Information, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Leibniz, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Prigogine, Relation Theory, Relational Programming, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Structure, Triadic Relations and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Readings On Determination • Discussion 3

  1. Pingback: Definition and Determination : 14 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s