Systems Of Interpretation • 1

Re: Peirce List DiscussionMike BergmanValentine Daniel

Questions have arisen about the variety of diagrams and figures that are currently found in common use to represent triadic sign relations in Peircean semiotics.  What do they mean?  Which is best?  Among the most popular pictures, some use geometric triangles while others use the sort of graph-theoretic diagram that Peirce used in his systems of logical graphs to represent triadic relations.

Diagrams and figures, like all signs, can be useful in communicating their intended interpretant signs and thus in coordinating attention to their intended objects, but only in communities of interpretation that comprehend their conventions of interpretation.  Conventions of interpretation are, by comparison, far more difficult to communicate.

In that light, one of the prerequisites to the possibility of communication in this area would be to ask ourselves what are the conventions of interpretation enabling this species of diagrams and figures.

This entry was posted in Artificial Intelligence, C.S. Peirce, Communication, Community of Interpretation, Diagrammatic Reasoning, Diagrams, Interpretation, Interpretive Frameworks, Knowledge, Knowledge Representation, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Objective Frameworks, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics, Sign Relations, Triadic Relations and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s