Peirce’s 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Comment 11.6

Posted on May 4, 2014 by

Let’s continue working our way through the above definitions, constructing appropriate examples as we go.

E_1 exemplifies the quality of totality at X.


LOR 1870 Figure 31		 (31)

E_2 exemplifies the quality of totality at Y.


LOR 1870 Figure 32		 (32)

E_3 exemplifies the quality of tubularity at X.


LOR 1870 Figure 33		 (33)

E_4 exemplifies the quality of tubularity at Y.


LOR 1870 Figure 34		 (34)

So E_3 is a pre-function e_3 : X \rightharpoonup Y, and E_4 is a pre-function e_4 : X \leftharpoonup Y.

This entry was posted in Graph Theory, Logic, Logic of Relatives, Logical Graphs, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Peirce’s 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Comment 11.6

  1. Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  2. Pingback: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Overview | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  3. Pingback: Peirce’s 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Comment 1 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

  4. Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 4 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.