Peirce’s 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Selection 9

We continue with §3. Application of the Algebraic Signs to Logic.

The Signs for Multiplication (cont.)

It is obvious that multiplication into a multiplicand indicated by a comma is commutative,1 that is,

\mathit{s},\!\mathit{l} ~=~ \mathit{l},\!\mathit{s}

This multiplication is effectively the same as that of Boole in his logical calculus.  Boole’s unity is my \mathbf{1}, that is, it denotes whatever is.

  1. It will often be convenient to speak of the whole operation of affixing a comma and then multiplying as a commutative multiplication, the sign for which is the comma.  But though this is allowable, we shall fall into confusion at once if we ever forget that in point of fact it is not a different multiplication, only it is multiplication by a relative whose meaning — or rather whose syntax — has been slightly altered;  and that the comma is really the sign of this modification of the foregoing term.

(Peirce, CP 3.74)

This entry was posted in Logic, Logic of Relatives, Mathematics, Peirce, Relation Theory, Semiotics and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Peirce’s 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Selection 9

  1. Pingback: Survey of Relation Theory • 3 | Inquiry Into Inquiry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s