Ask Meno Questions • Discussion 2

Re: Victoria N. Alexander

Tori & All,

I tend to favor that general way of speaking, having been brought up on classical cybernetics, optimal control, and systems theory, where we think of a system as passing through its state space, controlled by its objective to optimize a specific objective function defined on its space of states. When it comes to choosing intuition-aiding names for the various components of systems and regions of state spaces, those details can be fit to the particular type of system in view.

In the case of creatures like ourselves, it is possible to regard our conscious contents as representing our body’s theory of what is likely to deserve our mind’s attention. If that theory is a good one, then we may live to be conscious of another day.

Regards,

Jon

This entry was posted in Cybernetics, Epistemology, Inquiry, Inquiry Driven Systems, Intelligent Systems, Meno, Optimal Control, Peirce, Philosophy, Pragmatism, Semiotics, Systems Theory and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s